Global Warming is real and Man made

My headline is correct in all respects now that we have ClimateGate and now our own version of it in New Zealand. The Global Warming trend that the world is all in a lather about and Nick Smith plus his leftist pals bang on about relentlessly foaming at the mouth is man-made but only in the figures, not in anything else. The scientists simply made up the figures.

TBR has a summary but the graphs are the most telling. The Minister responsible for NIWA now needs to be calling in the auditor-General as this is actually tantamount to a fraud against the New Zealand public. If a business cooked the books as badly as this then the Directors would be in jail. It is unsurprising that cooking of the books has ocurred since Enron were the masterminds behind the whole carbon trading scam in the first place.

The graph at left is from NIWA, those “honest” scientists who work for the government and where Jim Salinger the now discredited scientist used to work. Salinger of course is widely implicated in the scam exposed by Climategate.

Their graph shows a clear warming trend. The truly sad thing is that the data has been doctored.

From NIWA’s web site ? Figure 7: Mean annual temperature over New Zealand, from 1853 to 2008 inclusive, based on

between 2 (from 1853) and 7 (from 1908) long-term station records. The blue and red bars show annual differences from the

1971 ? 2000 average, the solid black line is a smoothed time series, and the dotted [straight] line is the linear trend over 1909

to 2008 (0.92?C/100 years).

We have our very own bunch of liars on the public payroll duping us just like the UK.

The reality is of course far different. Analysis of the raw climate data from the same temperature stations has just turned up a very different result:

As Ian Wishart says;

Straight away you can see there’s no slope?either up or down. The temperatures are remarkably constant way back to the 1850s. Of course, the temperature still varies from year to year, but the trend stays level?statistically insignificant at 0.06?C per century since 1850.

Putting these two graphs side by side, you can see huge differences. What is going on?

Why does NIWA’s graph show strong warming, but graphing their own raw data looks completely different? Their graph shows warming, but the actual temperature readings show none whatsoever!

Have the readings in the official NIWA graph been adjusted?

The answer is of course yes. The scientists that have given the evidence that Nick Smith based his looney ETS on have cheated, cooked the books, fiddled the figures, actually they have lied.

Apparently David Wratt, the head of NIWA? has said his organization denies faking temperature data and he claims NIWA has a good explanation for adjusting the temperature data upward. Wratt says NIWA is drafting a media response for release later this afternoon which will explain why they altered the raw data.

Boy can’t wait for the response. Probably be something like the famous Dan Rather “Fake but Real” scandal.