CLIMATEGATE – Aussie Data faked too

Unbelievably the Lame Stream Media in New Zeland and Australaia still refuse to cover this growing controversy wihich is growing by the day.

The Warmist liars thought they could just tough it out but it is not just the emails that is undoing them it is their vaunted Computer Models and the code that supports it. Now Australian scientists are caught in the controversy.

Labelled “HARRY-READ-ME”, the log catalogues problems with the raw, historical climate data sent from hundreds of meteorological stations around the world.

The Australian data comes in for particular criticism as the programmer discovers World Meteorological Organisation codes are missing, station names overlap and many co-ordinates are incorrect.

At one point the programmer writes about his attempts to make sense of the data. “What a bloody mess,” he concludes. In another case, 30 years of data is attributed to a site at Cobar Airport but the frustrated programmer writes: “Now looking at the dates. something bad has happened … COBAR AIRPORT AWS [automatic weather station] cannot start in 1962, it didn’t open until 1993!”

In another he says: “Getting seriously fed up with the state of the Australian data … so many false references … so many changes … bewildering.”

The log spans four years of work at the university’s Climatic Research Unit, the British keeper of global temperature records. The programmer rails that the information has “no uniform integrity”.

His criticisms relate solely to the construction of the database and do not question the validity of historical temperature records or analyses that suggest the impact of human activity on global warming trends.

“I am very sorry to report that the rest of the databases seem to be in nearly as poor a state as Australia was. There are hundreds if not thousands of pairs of dummy stations, one with no WMO and one with, usually overlapping and with the same station name and very similar co-ordinates. I know it could be old and new stations, but why such large overlaps if that’s the case? Aarrggghhh! There truly is no end in sight.”

Enough is enough, there is more than sufficient data to warrant a worldwide investigation of fraud, the best thing that implicated scientists can do now is squeal on their colleagues to avoid prosecution.

Here in New Zealand NIWA’s data and methodology needs to be thoroughly tested. The fact that has emerged that their whole argument for Warming in New Zealand rests on the data of just seven data stations defies belief. NIWA needs to tell us why these seven, why no others?

If the data is corrupt, then the whole hypothesis of Anthropogenic Global Warming is corrupt, if the scientists are corrupt so too is the science.