Forget Peer Review, use Blog Review, Ctd

More interesting snippets from the ABC article on Blog review v. Peer Review:

A better system involving a combination of anonymous and online reviews is emerging to replace traditional review and is represented by journals such as?The Cryosphere. Ideally we would see independent auditing of the results and conclusions of important papers, but as yet there is no funding for such a system, nor much enthusiasm for this among the scientific community. However, blogs such as Climate Audit are picking up the slack in this area with mixed reactions from the scientific community.

In terms of ground-breaking papers, the rate of misses is much greater than the hits. Indeed, for one branch of science, epidemiology,?recent research suggests that most published findings are proven false within five years of publication. There is no reason to suggest that other disciplines have better score sheets. If an editor resigned every time a problem was found with a published paper, scientific publishing would quickly grind to a halt.

Most published findings proven false within five years! Are you reading this Nick Smith?