Warmest year on record? NASA admits they are only 38% certain of their claim

The left-wing have been clamouring that 2014 was the warmest year on record.

Never mind about the?record sea ice in the warmest year,?dodgy numbers?and?inane tweets from scientists?that have no basis in fact and are actually just more spin.

Now it appears that the media who all clamoured that last year was the warmest on record and the useful idiots on the left who have hyped the NASA report haven’t actually read the report…which says that they are only 38 per cent sure this was true.

The Nasa climate scientists who claimed 2014 set a new record for global warmth last night admitted they were only 38 per cent sure this was true.

In a press release on Friday, Nasa?s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) claimed its analysis of world temperatures showed ?2014 was the warmest year on record?.

The claim made headlines around the world, but yesterday it emerged that GISS?s analysis ? based on readings from more than 3,000 measuring stations worldwide ? is subject to a margin of error. Nasa admits this means it is far from certain that 2014 set a record at all.

Yet the Nasa press release failed to mention this, as well as the fact that the alleged ?record? amounted to an increase over 2010, the previous ?warmest year?, of just two-hundredths of a degree ? or 0.02C. The margin of error is said by scientists to be approximately 0.1C ? several times as much.

As a result, GISS?s director Gavin Schmidt has now admitted Nasa thinks the likelihood that 2014 was the warmest year since 1880 is just 38 per cent. However, when asked by this newspaper whether he regretted that the news release did not mention this, he did not respond. Another analysis, from the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature (BEST) project, drawn from ten times as many measuring stations as GISS, concluded that if 2014 was a record year, it was by an even tinier amount.

More bullshit and bluster from the global warming industry.

NASAs reputation and trustworthiness is in tatters. These chumps can’t even get their lies straight.

I wonder if the NZ Herald and Fairfax will now correct all their doomsaying articles since the report was released?

Its report said: ?Numerically, our best estimate for the global temperature of 2014 puts it slightly above (by 0.01C) that of the next warmest year (2010) but by much less than the margin of uncertainty.

?Therefore it is impossible to conclude from our analysis which of 2014, 2010, or 2005 was actually the warmest year? the Earth?s average temperature for the past decade has changed very little.?

In other words the pause continues, and their claims are statistically irrelevant. Perhaps a retraction might be in order?

No wonder the public have stopped listening to these chicken littles…they just manipulate statistics to justify their continued large government grants to make up even more numbers.

How are all those models going huh?

The whingers and moaners like Martyn Martin Bradbury and the folks at The Standard who are calling for “deniers” to be ignored should all pull their heads in.

No wonder it is easy to manipulate the media and the left-wing if they fall for spin like this.


– The Daily Mail