Same tactics used to discredit Trump used on Milo Yiannopoulos

I didn’t really want to write about this because I was concerned that by repeating the smear I might be helping plant doubt in people’s minds about Milo. The?tactics used against him, however, must have sunlight shone on them because they will be used against someone you support at some point and who knows, the next target could be us.

Social Justice Bullies have been trying to silence Milo for a long time. They were unable to beat him with reasoned, logical arguments,?they were unable to beat him with violent protests and they were unable to beat him by getting him kicked off twitter. No matter what they said or did Milo would pop up bigger and stronger than ever. They ignored his defence of freedom of speech, women’s rights and gay rights. They ignored his condemnation of paedophilia,?they called him alt-right and a white supremacist no matter how often he strongly denied it.

He got a lucrative book deal and it drove them crazy. They used social media to harass the publisher Simon & Schuster but they stood firm, (after all the pre-orders of his book made it to number one in just a few days.)

Then all of a sudden the rug was pulled out from under Milo and the publisher Simon & Schuster caved and not only cancelled the book but disavowed Milo as well. The Social Justice Bullies had finally found a smear effective enough to hurt him. I was sent the below e-mail by Amazon yesterday.


So how did they do it? Did they find previously unknown footage of Milo that revealed something shocking? Did they find someone who overheard him saying something shocking that no one knew about? Was he previously convicted of a terrible crime? Nope, no and definitely not.

Before Trump was attacked the Social Justice Bullies went searching for something they could use to smear him and found a person who was in the room years before he was running for president when he said something sexist. The media then picked it up and ran with it, making as big a mountain as they could out of this alleged mole hill. In Milo’s case the Social Justice Bullies sat down and watched all of Milo’s freely available videos of which there are many. They searched and searched until they found one that they could selectively edit to make it appear scandalous. They then took it to the media, proclaimed Milo a supporter of pedophilia just as they had previously crowned him a White supremacist who is the Queen of the alt-right and his book deal was withdrawn despite his protests of innocence.

The Media and the Social Justice Bullies know that they can make a smear stick even when the target denies their lies. They know that even when it is proved beyond reasonable doubt that they were wrong that the lies will continue to be spread.

Milos book cover was so right. He is dangerous. So dangerous in fact that the extreme-left will stop at nothing to take him down. They are apologists for Islam that supports child brides and follows a prophet who married a six-year-old girl but they reserve all their outrage about paedophilia for the man doing his very best to protect the Western world from the ideology that supports it.

…But Milo is pushing back against the allegations. He released a statement Sunday night claiming he himself was a victim of sex abuse as a minor.

?The videos do not show what people say they show. I did joke about giving better head as a result of clerical sexual abuse committed against me when I was a teen. If I choose to deal in an edgy way on an internet livestream with a crime I was the victim of that?s my prerogative. It?s no different to gallows humor from AIDS sufferers,? he wrote in his statement posted on Facebook.

He declared that he is absolutely repulsed by child molesters and dismissed the outrage as a coordinated effort by anti-Trump conservatives to him removed from CPAC.

?I do not support pedophilia. Period. It is a vile and disgusting crime, perhaps the very worst,? Yiannopoulos stated. ?There are selectively edited videos doing the rounds, as part of a co-ordinated effort to discredit me from establishment Republicans, that suggest I am soft on the subject.?

He added that he has exposed three pedophiles in his reporting: Louise Mensch?s former business partner?Luke Bozier, anti-Gamergate activist Nicholas Nyberg and tech reporter Chris Leydon.

The Breitbart writer also penned a lengthy attack on pedophiles and their alleged progressive defenders in 2015.

In his statement, Milo singled out National Review for criticism because prominent writers, such as Jonah Goldberg and Jay Nordlinger, have been very vocal in wanting Yiannopoulos ousted from CPAC.

?National Review, whose journalists are tweeting about this, published an article defending Salon for giving a pedophile a platform,? he said.

Yiannopoulos clarified that he meant young men and not actual ?boys? when speaking in the clip.

?I did say that there are relationships between younger men and older men that can help a young gay man escape from a lack of support or understanding at home. That?s perfectly true and every gay man knows it. But I was not talking about anything illegal and I was not referring to pre-pubescent boys,? Milo said. ?I shouldn?t have used the word ?boy? when I talked about those relationships between older men and younger gay men.?

In another Facebook post, Milo pointed out that the clip in question also shows him affirming the legal age of consent.

So far, the American Conservative Union is standing by its decision to have Milo as one of CPAC?s featured speakers in spite of the outcry. Before the clip was released Sunday, there was already outrage over CPAC?s decision because of Milo?s politics and alleged associations with the alt-right.

Yiannopoulos?s statement concluded with a shot at his conservative critics. ?This rush to judgment from establishment conservatives who hate Trump as much as they hate me, before I have had any chance to provide context or a response, is one of the big reasons gays vote Democrat.?

The actions of the publisher Simon & Schuster and the crusading SJB’s have made me even more determined to own Milo’s book. I hope he self-publishes soon although I have heard that other publishers have expressed interest.

Below is what was edited out of the video used to smear Milo because it didn’t fit their narrative of him as a supporter of Pedophilia.

Here is Milo defending himself once again from an extreme-left wing smear.