How late night comedians hurt America

Via the YouTube channel?1791LšŸ˜•
Full transcript:

1791L: One year ago, the country suddenly changed its political course, and in doing so began to follow a path which marked the beginning of the entertainment industry’s obsession with one man.

This man’s rise is what triggered a panic… to the survival of a class dwindling in its influence. As a consequence, prevailing means of entertainment no longer serve as an escape from our day-to-day struggle. They have degenerated into pitiful forms of consolation for their cultural and political defeat.

The time is half-past-eleven. It is the hour of leisure, and this is a sinister onset of propaganda, crudely disguised as an exercise in comedy. Even at midnight, late-night comedians are hard at work debasing political discourse to advance a perverse view of the nation. It is this perversion that has hoodwinked millions of cursory news consumers into elevating late-night comedians above journalists, and sober analysis.

They are consistently met with outsized praise for their allegedly bold commentary. Commentary so bold, and so often parroted by their fellow media and entertainment compadres, that one begins to wonder. How bold can it really be?

We must first consider what the late host is trying to do to the viewer, and that is to make the viewer laugh, to make them feel good.

Which of the following is going to be more effective at keeping you tuned in?

A piece of bold information that will challenge your preconceptions, or to assure you that the other side is so self-evidently wrong that only inbred Neanderthals would not be able to understand, and thus, the only valid response, is to laugh.

This arrogant, lazy snark isn’t just a feature of the late-night comedians’ routine, it is by design.

The spectacle.

The pre-recorded laughter signaling that it is time to laugh. The condescension. These all manufacture the delusion that the viewer is part of an enlightened class, and understands something that others just can’t. It activates a very primitive instinct of the human mind, playing to the tribal fear of being part of the outgroup. The group that just doesn’t understand — perhaps a group of big-rig-driving, cousin f**king rubes.

When you caricature the other side to a laugh track, it is the political equivalent of junk food.

It is instantly gratifying to see your political opponents ridiculed with unbridled snark — a satisfaction that could not be derived from considering ideas. All of these factors impose an entertainment genre that is the most far-reaching embodiment of confirmation bias and groupthink.

The viewer sits enthralled, thinking:?“Finally, I know the truth.”

No other attempt at manipulating the casual news consumer has been so effective, yet so devoid of substance.

But to describe these late shows as a facile exercise in crowd-pleasing would be all too obvious.

It might be bearable if it stopped at the typical spin-job you expect to see on television, but the characteristics that set the late shows apart are laziness and cowardice.

Lazily demeaning ideas to the sound of a laugh track is easy. Genuinely trying to understand other points of view is hard.

The really tough part of giving ideas a fair hearing is how much work, and how much misrepresentation it takes to ensure you’re not misrepresenting or maligning another person’s perspective.

But to the late host — applause in front of a credulous audience is everything. A prime manifestation of this practice is when [TBS ‘Full Frontal’] host [Samantha] Bee instructed her audience to laugh at a young man attending the RNC for his “Nazi haircut.” A quick search would have revealed to Ms. Bee that he, in fact, had cancer.

This brings a bigger issue to our attention. If they deliberately neglect to do basic research before smearing someone on national television, what other corners will they cut for a cheap gag?

One begins to wonder why late hosts have become especially unabashed in their disdain for people who think differently than they. But the picture becomes clear when you realize that, for so long, they had assured themselves of their stranglehold on a culture, a stranglehold beyond reproach…

They plastered their audiences with assurances of ideological invincibility, but the house of cards came tumbling down on Nov. 8.

Rather than coping with such a loss, they decided to spend their nights backing revenge on the people who rejected their views. The extent to which they have erected a culture around ostracising people with differing perspectives, predictably resulted in audiences becoming indignant when James Corden appeared “too friendly” with Sean Spicer. Or when Jimmy Fallon ruffled Trump’s hair. For the sin of not attacking their guests, both Corden and Fallon were bullied into backtracking. To viewers who have long been fed this villainize