A letter to the New Zealand Human Rights Commission

To Whom it may concern

I have heard that the Human Rights Commission is recommending a law to protect Islam: a so-called “disharmonious speech” law.

Please don’t go ahead with this action. It is completely unacceptable and I will provide you with the evidence below to make my case. You are defending an ideology that should not be defended, and I will show you why here.

Point One:?Islam is NOT a religion.? It is an ideology and a political system.

Evidence:

Link one?statistical Islam.

Link two statistical Islam.

If you go to the second link above, you will see that the trilogy of Islamic texts: the Koran, the hadith and Sira have 51 percent of their text about we non-Muslims (“kafir”, as the texts call us).
64 percent of the Koran is devoted to non-Muslims.??

It would be like me writing a book that is 64 percent about kittens, and then claiming that it is about mountains!

Point Two:?Islam covers almost everything in the daily life of a Muslim. To show this, we will look at Islamic jurisprudence which is called “fiqh

This covers almost everything in the life of a Muslim and it is divided into these fields:

  • Criminal law
  • Economics law
  • Etiquette law
  • Hygiene law
  • Inheritance law
  • Marital law
  • Military law
  • Political law
  • Theological law?? <— This is the ‘religious’ part of Islam.

Can you see from this that Islam is an ideology and a political system?

Point Three:?You are the Human RIGHTS Commission and Islam breaks EVERY human right that you can think of!

Evidence:

One:? Islam has killed an estimated 270 million people (and counting) in the last 1400 years. This is more than even the ideologies of Naziism and fascism combined. It is vastly more than two World Wars.

Have you heard of Timurlane (sometimes called ‘Timur the Lame’)?? His Islamic armies invaded India and slaughtered an estimated 17 million people!? One of the Boston Marathon bombers, Tamerlan Tsarnaev was named after him.

Timurlane perfected mass-murder on a bone-chilling level. Check out this excerpt from the book Genocide by William Rubinstein.

Two:?There are over 500 verses of hatred and intolerance towards non-Muslims in the Koran
and over 100 verses calling on Muslims to wage war against non-Muslims.

These are the FACTS, but I’m just getting started!

Paedophilia is permitted in Islam. Mohammed himself married his wife Aisha when she was six and consummated the marriage when she was nine. (12, 13).
See hereA complete guide to paedophilia in Islam (WRITTEN BY EX-MUSLIMS) and here on Wikipedia.

‘Thighing’ of infants is permitted in Islam too.

The thighing of Muhammad’s child bride Aisha is mentioned here.

Do you want to see MORE ‘human rights’ stuff?
How about SLAVERY?? Slavery is permitted in Islam!? There are slaves in Islamic countries TODAY!
See here?and here?and here.?

Is this still not bad enough for you?

How about necrophilia in Islam?
Check it out here?and here?

What about rape?? The Koran has TWO laws that endorse rape and zero laws that ban it!

Wife-beating is allowed in Islam too.

I have five valid questions for you.

  1. Why is the Human Rights Commission trying to take away New Zealanders’ right to criticise this ideology?? Don’t we have human rights?
  2. Have you learned nothing from overseas countries, where people are jailed for merely voicing their valid criticism of this ideology as I am doing here?
  3. Why does the Human Rights Commission want to destroy our precious freedom of speech that countless millions of people fought for in two World Wars to protect?
  4. Why has the Human Rights Commission never criticised Islam in the past?
    Is Islam not bad enough for you?? Does Islam not break enough human rights?
  5. Where is the consistency?? Your office is silent (or agrees) with criticism of the Catholic Church when it comes to abuse by priests, yet you want to protect an ideology that has all of the things I have mentioned!

The first thing you will want to do after reading my letter is to visit a Muslim imam to see if what I have said is true. This is a pointless move because:

  • You can read a Koran yourself.
  • The Imam will tell you what they know you want to hear
  • The Imam will probably show you a “nice-looking” Koran verse and you won’t know that it has been abrogated (superceded by later, violent verses).

You can learn about abrogation here?and here.

Finally, I will mention this quote from a review of the book?Modern Day Trojan Horse: The Islamic Doctrine of Immigration. Quote.

Meanwhile, Americans and Europeans have made countless accommodations to Muslim demands. They have included footbaths; high-decibel, five-times-daily calls to prayer; segregated male-female gym and swimming pool hours; halal food; workplace dispensations for handling pork products and for female head and face coverings; and special, public prayer rooms. Also, shari’ah-compliant financial transactions, the expunging of offensive likenesses of Mohammed or imagined depictions of Arabic characters that connote “Allah,” official swearings-in on Korans in place of customary Bibles, the neutralizing of official descriptive language about Islamists and the jihad, the revision of so-called offensive content in movies and television programs, the removal of representations of pigs from the public sphere, and many other acculturations to Muslim entreaties have all been made in the service of respecting Muslim religious beliefs and practices.

To those in Western democracies, these accommodating actions appear, on the surface, to be little more than harmless civil gestures, respecting the needs of a growing religion in their midst and welcoming a new addition to their proud, multicultural tradition.? Many Westerners pat themselves on the back for their liberal bent, their tolerance and their open-mindedness.

Little do they realize that this strategic pattern of demands is part of an insidious, 1,400-year-old proscription for Muslims that originates in the Koran and the Sunnah, the deeds of Mohammed.? It is the Hijra or doctrine of immigration. Modeled by Mohammed’s migration from Mecca to Medina, this immigration is not to a romanticized melting pot wherein newcomers gratefully search for opportunities for a better life in liberty and freely offer their talents and loyalty to benefit their new homeland.? This is immigration for Islamic expansionism employing ethnic separatism to gain special status and privileges within the host country.? Hijra is immigration designed to subvert and subdue non-Muslim societies and pave the way for eventual, total Islamization. End of quote.

“Special status and privileges”.? Check out how far that has gone at this link which shows the concessions that the West has already made to Muslims.

This has already started here, with separate swimming times for Muslim women at an Auckland pool. ( Gee…?I thought “separatism” apartheid and all that was supposed to be bad).

I (and many others) know about Islam. I and many others also know about Islamic ‘migration’ and the very real dangers that it poses. That is why there is such a critical need to defend our freedom of speech when it has gone from Europe and the UK.

I realise that this letter will come across as “impassioned” (to put it mildly). However, I have given you cold, hard facts. Islam is not a nice ideology. Goodness knows, the whole world should know that now, given that Islamic texts are freely available and given the blood-soaked history of Islam.

PLEASE, I urge you to not go ahead with proposing laws that ban criticism of Islam. These laws have been a disaster overseas. There are already sufficient laws in place here to protect anyone who thinks they are ‘threatened’.

I will leave the last word to an ex-Muslim. Quote.

Quote.
I was born in Pakistan as an atheist. Then Islam, a cult, was imposed upon me as a religion. Muslim invaders who conquered large parts of my country forced my ancestors to convert to their religion. Once one generation succumbed to Islam, the successive generations were either threatened or brainwashed so that they would never leave this evil cult. My forefathers were even used by Muslim invaders to spread their evil faith and empire. I was a fundamentalist Muslim with beard. I, however, managed to realize that Islam, in the guise of a religion, is actually an imperialistic ideology, similar to Nazism. It is like a net with the spider waiting for the big meal. It spreads through aggression and deception. It is time that we all try to understand ‘what Islam truly is’ and unite humankind to confront this vicious doctrine of hate. This book is a small step in that direction.”End of quote.

That is an ex-Muslim speaking.

If you want to ignore me, PLEASE do not ignore him.

Thank you for your time.

32%
×