Map of the day

Source – Brilliant Maps

Click on the image for a high-res view

Regional EU GDP Per Capita 2004 vs 2014

The map above shows the relative GDP per capita of the EU-28?s?NUTS 2?Regions in?Purchasing Power Standard?(PPS) in 2004 and 2014.

And if you?re wondering just what exactly PPS is, Eurostat explains that it:

is an artificial currency unit. Theoretically, one PPS can buy the same amount of goods and services in each country. However, price differences across borders mean that different amounts of national currency units are needed for the same goods and services depending on the country. PPS are derived by dividing any economic aggregate of a country in national currency by its respective purchasing power parities.

Therefore, the map above shows the relative wealth of each region in comparison to the EU-28 average for each year. Those in green have a GDP per capita at least?5%greater than the EU average in that year, whereas those in red have a GDP per capita that is no more than?75%?of the EU average.

Inner London (UK) was the EU?s richest region in 2014 with a GDP per capita of?539%of the average.

Severozapaden (Bulgaria) was the poorest with a GDP per capita of?just 30%?of the EU-28 average.

2004 was chosen as the base year since this is when Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia all joined the EU. Bulgaria and Romania joined in 2007 and Croatia joined in 2013.

For most of these countries, the economic effects have clearly been positive. Prior to their accession to the EU almost none of these countries had any regions with GDP per capita above the EU average. However, 10 years later that was no longer the case.

On the other hand, Southern Europe most notably Spain and Greece did not fare so well during this period with many of their regions falling to the lowest category.

Overall, economic changes between 2004 and 2014, meant that the EU as a whole become slightly more equal with?40%?of people living in the richest regions (compared to 44% in 2014) and only?25%?living in the poorest ones (compared to 27% in 2004).