Andrew Sullivan: “You can have liberal democracy or mass immigration. It?s becoming increasingly clear you can?t have both”

Andrew Sullivan makes some interesting observations on the intersection of a liberal democracy and mass immigration: Quote:

It seems to me a pretty big indicator of Europe?s future that a party with neo-Nazi roots is currently surging in the polls in ? Sweden. Yes, super-liberal, deeply anti-racist Sweden. The election is on September 9, and this famously tolerant social democracy ? a humanitarian superpower that has recently absorbed more refugees per capita than any other European nation ? is swinging hard to the right over?immigration and crime. As of 2017, one in six people in Sweden were born outside the country. Sweden has historically had a higher representation of humanitarian migrants than the rest of Europe, but in recent years, larger numbers are coming from Syria, Iraq, Somalia, and Eritrea. The gender mix of these new arrivals is also skewed ??if all applicants are granted asylum, the male-female ratio could become lopsided, growing from 105:100 to 107:100 among those aged 18 to 34. Integration has been?hard?and the country is?statistically?one of Europe?s worst at integrating foreigners. It?s easier to welcome people than to find ways to get them to adjust to an entirely different culture. Riots began in 2008 and have occurred frequently since.?Crime is up:

Dozens of people have been killed in the past two years in attacks in the capital Stockholm and other big cities by gangs that are mostly from run-down suburbs dominated by immigrants. In the latest bloodshed, three men were shot dead and three were wounded outside an internet cafe in the city of Malmo on June 18. A fourth man was shot dead days later and another man survived because he was wearing a bullet-proof vest.

The far right Sweden Democrats have emerged as the party most willing to fan the fear these incidents have understandably aroused ? and it?s been contagious, with almost every other party vowing to?crack down?on immigration and crime. The far-right party?s current plan is a freeze in immigration entirely and a vote to leave the E.U. At 20 percent in the polls, it?s possible they could surpass the moderates to become the major opposition party. At the very least, they could be kingmakers in the next parliament. It hasn?t helped that another?wave?of immigrant-gang?related car arson earlier this week has put crime front and center of the campaign, generating fears of chaos.

My fear is that the admirably humane acceptance of refugees and the remarkable openness to mass immigration from outside of Europe is nonetheless destabilizing liberal democracy in Sweden and across Europe. Well, it?s not a fear any more. It?s a fact. It seems you simply cannot enact such massive sudden demographic changes ? even with the best of motives ? and expect no backlash. The rise of UKIP in Britain and Brexit itself were a response to this; so are the shocking gains of the AfD in Germany, the consolidation of Orb?n?s power in Hungary, and the new populist government in Italy. It seems to me that in Europe at least, you can have liberal democracy or mass immigration. It?s becoming increasingly clear you can?t have both. End quote.

This is the precise point that we have been making for years. Mass immigration, particularly that from Arab Islamic countries is incompatible with liberal democracy.

The pity is our politicians celebrate mass immigration from those countries as the very embodiment of liberal democracy and are at the same time cutting our own throats,