We have been lied to: Merkel admits Migration pact is legally binding

German Chancellor Angela Merkel and New Zealand’s Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern. Photo: AFP

We have been lied to.

Again and again, we have been told by both politicians and the mainstream media that the UN migration pact is non-binding. This has ensured apathy from the general public, who decided that if it was non-binding then there was nothing to be concerned about.

The pact demands that countries who sign it treat unlimited and illegal migration as a human right, which thereby turns the description ?illegal migrants? into hate speech and criminalises any criticism of migration.

The biggest red flag raised by the pact was its inclusion of the media in its attempt to get rid of all dissent. If media organisations criticise anything to do with migration they can be punished by having their state funding removed, while those who toe the United Nations line will be rewarded with? ?investment?.

Voice of Europe wanted to know whether the countries that refuse to sign the pact are still bound to it because they are members of the UN. Here is what they found?out. quote.

[…] In a frank exchange with Germany?s Chancellor Angela Merkel, Mr. Hebner of the AfD drew out an admission that it is, in fact, legally binding. As well, that it will be adopted as rule for all UN Member states once enacted.

Mr. Hebner asks: ?You can see for yourself clearly that during the conference, the spokesperson for Morocco emphasised that the agreement was legally binding. He said clearly, in a literal sense, that there is a corresponding legal bond for all nations taking part as well as an obligation of implementation. You and your delegation did not raise a single word of objection to that statement but idly accepted it. I would like to emphasise that the parliamentary motion was not presented at the conference. ?

Ms. Merkel?s response not only confirmed what we at Voice of Europe have been suspecting all along, the claim it is indeed binding, but that once voted and accepted it will be valid for all:

?So then, during the UN General Assembly next week, the pact will once again be up for debate and a decision will be made on whether to accept it. At this time, a member state can demand a vote. When two-thirds of the represented countries agree then it is valid for all. That?s how majority decision-making works.? end quote.

New Zealand needs to leave the United Nations. This is the stuff of nightmares. A world government that can impose its will on sovereign countries, even those who refused to sign the pact!