The single greatest threat to Pacific people solved

Climate change is going to submerge our nations; the rest of you must act urgently! So goes the cry from all those in the Pacific wanting a large hand-out from the West.

Thinking outside the box, Kevin Rudd came up with a novel approach to solve this ‘greatest threat’ in one simple constitutional change. It did not go down well with Tuvalu’s Prime Minister Enele Sopoaga. Quote.

A proposal from Kevin Rudd to address the impacts of climate change on the Pacific has been labelled as “imperial thinking” by Tuvalu’s leader, who lambasted the former prime minister’s suggestion to swap Australian citizenship for maritime resources.

Mr Rudd wrote in a recent essay that Australia should offer citizenship to residents of the small Pacific nations of Tuvalu, Kiribati and Nauru in exchange for control of their seas, Exclusive Economic Zones, and fisheries.

“Under this arrangement, Australia would also become responsible for the relocation over time of the exposed populations of these countries [totalling less than 75,000 people altogether] to Australia where they would enjoy the full rights of Australian citizens,” Mr Rudd wrote.

But the idea ? which in essence would see the countries give up their sovereignty ? has been strongly criticised by Tuvalu’s Prime Minister Enele Sopoaga, who warned it amounts to a form of neo-colonialism.

“The days of that type of imperial thinking are over,” Mr Sopoaga told the ABC.

“Certainly [we will] not to be subjugated under some sort of colonial mentor; those days are over.

“We are a fully independent country, and there is no way I’m going to compromise our rights to fisheries resources, our rights to our immediate resources.”

Australia, New Zealand and Pacific nations last year signed a declaration calling climate change “the single greatest threat” to Pacific people.

Tuvalu is made up of nine low-lying coral atolls and its highest point is just 4.5 metres above sea level, making it particularly vulnerable to climate change.

Mr Sopoaga pointed out that Mr Rudd’s proposal comes after Australia exported $66 billion in coal last year, making it our most valuable traded commodity.

“The more [Australia fails to be] serious about cutting coal mining and exporting this for money, the more problematic the issue of global warming and the more we have to adapt,” he said.

“These are the real issues that need [to be] settled and addressed, and perhaps leaders of Australia could focus more on that.”

Instead, Mr Sopoaga has called for the establishment of a Pacific supra-state, along the lines of the European Union, that is “based on cooperation and integration, perhaps into some sort of United States of the Pacific”.

Mr Sopoaga says this would be a more realistic way for small Pacific Island nations to amplify their concerns about climate change on the global stage.

“We will stand together to address issues of sustainable development, climate change, plastic pollution and the management of our shared resources,” he said.

Mr Rudd’s key proposal is to relocate citizens of Pacific Island nations to Australia once rising sea levels make these nations uninhabitable, pointing out that their populations combined is less than half of Australia’s total annual immigration intake.

“If these countries start to submerge in the years ahead, Australia would face international pressure to provide safe haven for our Pacific neighbours anyway,” he wrote.

“In effect, they would become climate change refugees and the world would look to Australia for leadership.”

He suggested that Australia should consider developing a proposal “to enter into formal constitutional condominium” with Tuvalu, Kiribati and Nauru, similar to the current arrangement with Norfolk Island ? a plan that would require all four countries to change their constitutions.

Mr Sopoaga dismissed the idea, saying that urgent action on climate change was what was needed.[…] End quote.


Thrown a life-line for a certain future well above sea level in Australia compared to imminent inundation, ruination and starvation, this generous solution is rejected as colonial subjugation.

Does this prime minister have the best interests of his people at heart? Or is the trough too tasty to extract his snout?

Perhaps living there he has seen the evidence that coral is growing like it always has and many islands are actually increasing in size and he knows it is all a scam to get money. Maybe I am just a cynic.