863 days of Trump bashing

BBC News AFP/Getty

President Donald Trump, love him or hate him, is a very, very patient man.

Democrats promised his impeachment the day after he was elected on 8 November 2016.

It took 863 days of president bashing on an unprecedented scale before he was cleared of all charges of Russian collusion. On 22 March 2019 the left wing appointed group of Trump haters led by Robert Mueller was forced to capitulate.

During that time Trump had dominated the front pages while his administration became mired in every type of slander and integrity destroying controversy.

Trump was too large a target to miss and the lazy New Zealand media jumped in boots and all. They were happy to be spoon fed overseas opinion pieces as fact, their lefty minds were already made up about the orange man who owed no political debt to anyone and spoke his own mind using Twitter to circumvent a hostile media. Quote. 

Both the Putin and Trump Russian and US presidents had poured scorn on suggestions of “collusion”, with Trump calling the Muller investigation it “the greatest political witch hunt in history.” End of quote.


This agreement of no collusion was portrayed by the media as proof that Trump was a Russian agent; Putin got an easy win, adding to the dysfunctionality of American politics.

Media worldwide spent the first six months of Trump?s presidency grooming the public for his impending impeachment.

Democratic Leader of the House of Representative, Nancy Pelosi, claimed ?cold, hard evidence? of collusion between Trump and the Russians even before Robert Mueller was appointed special counsel on 17 May 2017 to oversee the investigation into allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election.

In June 2017 media released the first ?cold hard evidence? placing Barack Obama (and Hillary Clinton by association) DOJ and the CIA centre stage in the plot to bring down the president.  

The Washington Post titled their revelation ?Obama?s secret struggle to punish Russia for Putin?s election assault? calling it the ?first moment of true foreboding about Russia?s intentions.? Note that the CIA document was shrouded in secrecy to prevent any leakage in the likely event that it wouldn’t be needed because Hillary would succeed at the polls. Quote.

Early last August, an envelope with extraordinary handling restrictions arrived at the White House. Sent by courier from the CIA, it carried ?eyes only? instructions that its contents be shown to just four people: President Barack Obama and three senior aides.

Inside was an intelligence bombshell, a report drawn from sourcing deep inside the Russian government that detailed Russian President Vladi?mir Putin?s direct involvement in a cyber campaign to disrupt and discredit the U.S. presidential race.

But it went further. The intelligence captured Putin?s specific instructions on the operation?s audacious objectives ? defeat or at least damage the Democratic nominee, Hillary Clinton, and help elect her opponent, Donald Trump.

At that point, the outlines of the Russian assault on the U.S. election were increasingly apparent. Hackers with ties to Russian intelligence services had been rummaging through Democratic Party computer networks, as well as some Republican systems, for more than a year. In July, the FBI had opened an investigation of contacts between Russian officials and Trump associates. And on July 22, nearly 20,000 emails stolen from the Democratic National Committee were dumped online by WikiLeaks.? End of quote.

Washington Post

Naturally, the CIA report is in the Mueller report albeit heavily redacted, but it will never see the light of day in public.

Let?s not forget that crooked Hillary?s unauthorised private server containing thousands of confidential US Government emails that was also hacked.

Evidence points to a Russian conspiracy in the US 2016 elections, but who instigated and funded it needs to be the subject of a further investigation.

Any investigation should include crooked Hillary?s 2010 sale of Uranium One to the Russians and their subsequent large donations to the Clinton Foundation. At that time Uranium One held 20% of the US?s uranium resource and the sale forced the US to source uranium from Australia. Why anyone would sell a limited supply of nuclear material to an adversary is a mystery.

Immediately after Mueller?s findings were released, the Democrats were frozen in disbelief before turning on Muller in a frenzy as he went from hero to zero in five seconds. The Democrats demanded to see the full unredacted report, knowing full well that under US law this is not permitted. They also asked for permission for their own ?independent assessment? of Mueller?s independent probe. Quote.

The Democratic chairs of powerful committees in the House demanded Attorney General William Barr release special counsel Robert Mueller’s entire report, as well the underlying evidence of the nearly two-year investigation, by early next week.? End of quote.

CBS News

It won’t happen but Democrats hang onto a slim thread of hope for another hit at Trump based on the Mueller report stating ?there is potential obstruction of justice by the Trump administration which did not result in any charges?. Trump was unimpressed, tweeting:


The final cost of the Mueller probe is estimated at around $25 million.

Trump?s administration was kept busy fighting on several fronts. The Democrats and the media were falsely accusing them; they were carrying out Trump?s promise to ?drain the swamp? and were also distracted by collateral damage from the Mueller investigation fingering former Trump team members. Some were jailed for charges unrelated to Trump?s political campaign or his duties as President of the United States. Quote.

Special counsel Robert Mueller?s team indicted or got guilty pleas from 34 people and three companies during their lengthy investigation, which is now complete.

That group is composed of six former Trump advisers, 26 Russian nationals, three Russian companies, one California man, and one London-based lawyer. Seven of these people (including five of the six former Trump advisers) have pleaded guilty.? End of quote.


If you swallowed the lie presented by New Zealand media that former members of Trump?s team were found guilty of colluding with the Russians, you were totally misled. No Trump advisers were found guilty of criminally conspiring with Russian officials to impact the election.  They were found guilty of making false statements to the FBI, Congress and the House Intelligence Committee, lying to the FBI and tax evasion.

Questions remain. Who colluded with the Russians; who persuaded the media to pursue Trump; and who fed them the lies used to groom the public about Trump?s alleged Russian collusion? 

The Democratic Party, Barak Obama and Hillary Clinton?s fingerprints are all over this.