Whaleoil transcript: The Mueller report. Part two

Sarah Sanders: Mexico is willing to do more about immigration than Dems

Part 1 of this transcription covered president Trump?s statement about possibly sending illegals to Sanctuary Cities. This part covers the Mueller report.

Fox News:

Well, let?s just finish with this segment so I can get onto the next one. Attorney General Barr says that he is going to release a redacted version of the almost 400-page Mueller report this week. But I want to put up what the president tweeted last night on this subject. This is the president:

Why should Radical Left Democrats in Congress have a right to retry and examine the $35 million two years in the making, no collusion, Mueller Report when the crime committed was by Crooked Hillary, the DNC and Dirty Cops? Attorney-General Barr will make the decision.

I understand what the president says there; he is leaving it to Barr, but is he suggesting Congress doesn?t have a right to see the Mueller Report?

Sarah:

No, that?s not what he is saying. Um, the president has been clear, he wants transparency throughout the process. But the president is one hundred percent right. Once they get the report and they see what the summary has already laid out: that there was no collusion, there is no obstruction, it?s time to move on. They don?t get a second chance at trying to reinvestigate the president after two years and millions and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted on a complete hoax that?

Fox News:

But? but

Sarah:

?that we all knew was a lie from the beginning.

Fox News:

But Sarah, that doesn?t?.

Sarah:

?something that Democrats use as an excuse for why they lost an election.

Fox News:

But Sarah, the report, according to Barr, and that?s all we know about it was his bottom-line conclusions, says that, according to Mueller, while the report does not find clear evidence that the president committed obstruction, it doesn?t exonerate him either. And the question is: how are you going to deal with some evidence that?s going to come out in this report that clearly is going to be damaging to the president?

Sarah:

I? I don?t think it is going to be damaging to the president because the entire purpose of the investigation was whether or not there was collusion. Mueller was crystal clear in the fact that there was no collusion not just between the president?

Fox News:

But he was not crystal clear on obstruction?

Sarah:

?with any American. They couldn?t find anything. They couldn?t make a determination is basically Mueller?s way of saying, ?we could? we can?t find anything, we are going to leave that up to the process? ? which is the Attorney General. He has made a decision and so we consider this to be case closed. There was no collusion, there was no obstruction? which? I don?t know how you can interpret that any other way than total exoneration.

Fox News:

All right, we are going to?

Sarah:

I think it is absolutely absurd that Democrats are going to continue to push this false narrative that there was somehow wrong doing on behalf of the president. He won because he was the better candidate with a better message, a better vision, and he simply out worked his opponent?

Fox News:

Okay?

Sarah:

Absolutely insane that they?re going to continue to push this.


25%
×