Research shows male genital mutilation to have health benefits exceeding 200 times the risk

What is it with cultures wanting to cut bits of our bobs? ?And no,

A systematic review of male infant circumcision led by Dr Brian Morris, professor emeritus at the University of Sydney, found the benefits of the procedure exceed the associated risks by 200 to one.

The study, published in the World Journal of Clinical Pediatrics, reports that uncircumcised males face an 80 per cent risk of developing a foreskin-related condition requiring medical attention.

By comparison, the risk of an “associated adverse event” from the circumcision procedure – the surgical removal of the foreskin of the penis – is about one in 250.

“Over their lifetime more than one in two uncircumcised males will suffer an adverse medical condition caused by their foreskin,” said Dr Morris.

An adverse medical condition. ?Like a rash, or inflammation. ? A bit like mould growing in those killer houses, that’s what happens if you don’t keep yourself clean or if you tear the skin by being… erm… an enthusiastic penis enthusiast. Read more »

This article gives me the urge to chop the top off a certain Russian banana

Ismail Berdiyev (L), Chairman of the North Caucasian Muslims' Coordinating Centre shakes hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin

Ismail Berdiyev (L), Chairman of the North Caucasian Muslims’ Coordinating Centre shakes hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin

Can you hear me screaming from where ever you live? This Russian jerk ?Muslim cleric thinks mutilating Russian women’s genitals is a great idea that will stop fornication. When men’s genitals are mutilated it is minor in comparison to what is done to women’s genitals and while it may reduce sensation slightly it does not stop sexual enjoyment. If taking away sexual enjoyment is what this jerk Muslim cleric wants then I suggest male genital?mutilation be upscaled to female genital mutilation levels and that he has the most extreme procedure (type three) done on him without anaesthetic immediately.

Senior Muslim cleric and Islamic spiritual leader of the North Caucuses Ismail Berdiyev has declared in an interview that if female genital mutilation (FGM) could be forced upon all women that would be “very good”.

Read more »

Surely the solution is soap and water?

I am against circumcision of anyone, male or female. I don’t care if it is a religious tradition or just a family tradition. In a clean, modern, civilised society there is zero health justifications for cutting bits off male and female genitals.

In an effort to modernise female genital mutilation a facebook page has been created to promote what they call Islamic Female circumcision. They consider themselves progressive because they are promoting a cut that doesn’t mutilate the woman as much. They lie about its medical benefits but give themselves away when they refer to the skin that protects the clitoris ( the hood ) as a ” dirty piece of skin.”


Very cleverly they have linked husband’s pleasuring their wives with oral sex to throat cancer. If we were to believe their lies a woman who refuses to be cut is putting her husband at risk of developing throat cancer if he is a good lover. The clear message on this website is if you want your partner to go down on you you need to cut the hood off your clitoris.

Read more »

Face of the day


Shocked face

Shocked face

Todays face of the day sums up how you will feel about this post.

It is how I feel abut this post and it is especially how MEN will feel about this post.

You were WARNED.

Read more »

On circumcision