Derek Fox

Maori party turns on terror enabler Derek Fox

The Maori party has moved to distance themselves from terror enabler Derek Fox.

The Maori Party distanced itself from former candidate Derek Fox after he controversially blamed the victims of the Paris terror attacks for their deaths.

Mr Fox said on Facebook that the editor of French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo?had “paid the price” for his “bigotry” and “arrogance”.

He stood by his comments, and said if the magazine had not published gratuitous insults, the victims “would still be alive now”.

“But they didn’t, in fact they ramped it up to sell more mags. Well, they got bitten severely on the bum.”? Read more »

Oppressed Maori Derek Fox explains away today’s shootings

From Derek the Maori Party candidate’s?Facebook page


So Derek.

I should not be critical of things, or poke fun at things, because when a crime is committed against me, or worse, someone takes my life, “I asked for it”? ? I have a responsibility to not bring up issues because going on about them might see me dead?

By the way, nice way to hijack a French tragedy for your own Maori radical needs. ?You’re all class.

Remembering Parekura


It was 2008 and David Farrar and I were in Gisborne to watch a debate as guests of Richard Harman. His production company was televising the debate between Derek Fox and Parekura Horomia for the TVNZ 7 Swing Seats debate.

The theatre, I forget its name now, was packed, there were rosettes, banners, and good fun being had.

It was a good old-fashioned election meeting with opposing teams sledging each other in good-natured banter.

The stage was set, everyone was ready…and then the pollies came out to play.

Derek Fox came out first, his supporters went berserk with clapping and cheering. He sat on the stool provided.

Then Parekura Horomia came out…same reception…but he stopped, stared down at what was now apparent to everyone there at the tiny little stool..he threw back his head and laughed then turned around and proceeded to ever so slowly back himself onto the stool…the audience hushed, everyone stopped and as he sat down the legs on the tiny little stool groaned and spread…and then Parekura stood up…called for a more robust chair/stool.

Everyone roared with laughter and the debate got started. Parekura even joked about it several times.

That night was probably one of the most enjoyable political?occasions?I have ever attended, for the raw politics, for the old-fashioned campaigning and for the enjoyment of everyone in?attendance.

Afterwards we all went out to dinner and stayed eating and drinking till late into the night. It was all very convivial and hugely entertaining.

I will always remember that night and it is one of my more enduring memories of Parekura Horomia….to me he was a man to tried to achieve many great things, but more importantly was a man who knew people, you could see that during the night, it was obvious.

Labour lost a good MP yesterday. My only hope is that the person they select is even half as good as Parekura Horomia was for his electorate.

Rest in Peace.

Now this is irony

Excuse me while I just stop my side splitting at this headline and vow from Labour.

Labour's mirth inducing promise

Labour should be mocked mercilessly for such a taudry attempt at politicking. The country wouldn’t be in the position it is in if they hadn’t rammed through the original Foreshore and Seabed law. Now, petulantly they are attempting to re-write history and claim that they care.

Personally I think National have botched the law, they should have just repealed Labour’s theft of property rights and put things back where they were before Labour?panicked.

I well remember a debate in Gisborne, that Farrar and I attended on the Blogmobile tour, between Parekura Horomia and Derek Fox. Derek Fox stated that all that Maori wanted was the right to go to court. That was exactly what labour took away from Maori. It should be re-instated and left at that.

Tariana Turia succintly explains that which Labour and Phil Goff fail to understand.

“I would say they’ve (Labour) been watching all the representations that have come to the committee, they think that every Maori in the country is against it, but what they don’t realise is there’s not one Maori in the country that’s forgotten what they did.”

Labour by vowing to repeal the repeal just look stupid. I wonder when Phil Goff will start listening to The Whale and start simply asking voters “Are things are any better under National?”. Until he does he is going to keep looking stupid.

10,000 Posts

This post is actually 10,003. The post on Sir Roger Douglas and his Facebook status was the 10,000th post.

Not a bad effort for a one man band, and just a bit over 4 years to do it.


Good use of Social Media – Sir Roger Douglas

Sir Roger Douglas might be the old man of the house but he is showing that he is coming to grips with new media. This is his current Facebook status and it is a commentary on creeping socialism.

Sir Roger Douglas on creeping socialism


Clark begged to have Sir Roger back

The Budget, according to Sir RogerLike the Denny Crane of New Zealand politics, Sir Roger Douglas sits in his 11th-floor office and flicks between brazen, brilliant and off-beat. As with the Boston Legal character, Sir Roger’s high points are largely behind him,… [NZ Herald Politics]

Patrick Gower has two good articles in the Herald today, both about Sir Roger Douglas.

The more interesting is the one about Helen Clark begging Sir Roger to come back into cabinet. This is interesting because now the wicked witch is dead people seem no longer to be afraid of her and her revenge. The stories are starting to come out.

So, Sir Roger reckons that Clark came to his house to beg her forgiveness and have him back in cabinet. This is quite different from the story Clark has told over the years.

I wonder what else is bullshit from Clark’s re-writing of history.

We'll stick with ACT: Key

We’ll stick with ACT: KeyPrime Minister John Key says National will not fall out with ACT despite a blistering attack on the Government’s handling of the economic downturn by ACT MP Roger Douglas. [Stuff Politics]

This is really spam journalism with Stuff beating up a speech by Sir Roger Douglas where he labels the Cycleway project a path to poverty. In many ways Sir Roger is right but that would be if this was the only intiative to combat the recession.

However John Key has scotched any beatup of a bust-up over the comments. It is of course silly for journalists to make a big deal over this. We have moved on from the days of the dictator Clark where everyone had to tow the metaphotical party line even coalition and support partners.

We on the Centre-Right are far more grown up about people’s opinions and can happily work with all sorts brushing off bad in favour of the good. Journalists though are far too conditioned to the previous adminsitrations dogma and rules.


Bill English should be sacked

Fran O’Sullivan: Conservative’s push may be anything butBill English is a self-admitted conservative who may yet prove to be the type of Finance Minister who will push for big economic shifts – like proposals to make Auckland a super city – to send strong signals about the way this Government… [NZ Herald Politics]

In Fran O’Sullivan’s piece this morning Bill English openly criticises the Prime Minister. This might be ok if Bill English ever had any original ideas of his own but frankly he should just STFU and implement what John wants. Could you imagine Brian Talboys voicing opinions contrary to Robert Muldoon? Or Cullen being openly scoffing about Clark? Not even Winston at his worst in the Bolger days would slur a word from the Green Parrot against his Prime Minister. Bill English is simply out of line.

His silly opinions are not warranted and frankly not wanted. This country needs vision and innovation not his tired second-hand poorly learned policies from Ruth Richardson and Roger Douglas. John Key was elected to provide that vision and the sort of ideas that netted him $50 million. All Bill English has managed to do with his life is father 6 children, lose a boxing match and get the lowest ever party vote for the National party ever. He sure as hell doesn’t have a cool “Fitty” sitting in the bank. Mr 20.9% should pull his head in or John Key should cut it off.

While we are at it on the sorting out non-performers how about booting Nick “the Pinko” Smith to touch, the man (can I still call him that) is a liability.

If we continue to have loose cannons like English and Smith in cabinet then this will be a one term government. I think we need to look to the Australian model again and re-introduce the concept of a Treasurer. Someone visonary with balls to front popular yet innivative solutions to the issues we face. Clearly Sir Roger Douglas would the best person for this role but unfortunately he is politically unpalatable. The clear front runner for this role would be Stephen Joyce. He has no baggage, has shown innovation in the past though the election campaign was rather brown bread it was at least successful. Bill English can then be the Finance Minister but answerable to the Treasurer. Bill is far more suited to the more boring nuts and bolts and orders following than trying any original thought. At if we try this model again the treasurer won’t be a drunken sot propping up the bar at the Green Parrot.

John Key: Politician of the year

John Key: Politician of the yearTo borrow the immortal words of Australian politician Bill Hayden, some might argue National could have put up the proverbial drover’s dog as leader and still won last month’s election such was its huge lead in the polls over preceding… [NZ Herald Politics]

John Armstrong makes the case for John Key to be politician of the year. It is hard to argue otherwise, though I am sure the paupers at the lap-blog will give it a go.

I think the most telling part of John Armstrongs column is one that few bloggers and commentators have yet picked up and that is the huge sea change in New Zealand politics. Certainly the Labour Party is yet to pick up that sea change after picking yet another old timer to be their temporary leader.

What also matters is that Key speaks for a new generation which entered Parliament in force at last month’s election – a generation which is less hidebound by ideology or consumed with refighting the battles of the 1980s or the 1990s.

This is a generational shift in politics. The baby-boomers are on their way out. Winston Peters has gone. Clark and Michael Cullen are poised to check out.

The new generation has never experienced a wage-price freeze, fixed exchange rates, Think Big or farmers being subsidised according to the number of sheep they had on their farms.

The new generation has only a hazy memory of the Labour Government which swept all that away in a revolution of reform before imploding. Seeing him in Parliament, those younger MPs must view Sir Roger Douglas as a relic from another age.

Key’s advantage is that his age and political freshness places him at the vanguard of the new generation – something that cannot be said for the new Labour leadership.

Labour painted JohnKey a a bumblng fool and fell into the trap of believing thei own spin. It was ultimately fatal and the bumbling fool was Helen Clark who bmbled once too many and fell on her sword. One area where John Key absolutely ran rings around Clark was Winston Raymond Peters, 63, unemployed of no fixed abode, here John Key absolutely painted Clark into a corner and even better used her own paint and her own brush, he then threw down the brush and as the ad says “He walked away”.

And what about Winston Raymond Peters, 63, unemployed of no fixed abode?

What we can be sure about is that Peters, having used the media to boost his career early on, grew to despise it. His version always had to be the correct one. That he could never concede to being wrong was what destroyed him – not the bunkum that he was the target of some kind of big business-establishment-media collusion.

NZ First, a party built solely around a personality cult, will not be back.

Peters will be missed. The charming, generous, understanding Peters, that is. Not the cantankerous, argumentative, frustrating and difficult creature with whom other parties were forced to do business, smiling benignly as they did so but at the same time looking about as comfortable as someone lying on a bed of sharpened nails.

WRP, 63, UONFA is one of the few people I genuinely loathe. The man is liar fair and square, a disingenuous prick and a sot who should not be remembered fondly, rather he should be kicked into the gutter and forgotten. He never did get round to suing me for calling him a liar. Fucking loser.